Stijn Slump vs Maximilian Figl Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Jun at 12:42 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Slump vs M. Figl

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Slump 1 - 0 Figl
They have played 3 sets in total, with Stijn Slump winning 2 and Maximilian Figl winning 1. The last match between Stijn Slump and Maximilian Figl was at the M15 Casablanca, 26-06-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Stijn Slump getting the victory 6-7(2) 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Slump | 1 |
| Figl | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Casablanca(06-26-25)
S. Slump vs M. Figl H2H Profile
S. Slump vs M. Figl Match Preview:
- Slump has a slight edge in second serve points with a win rate of 43.93% compared to Figl's 42.82%. Could this marginal difference influence the outcome? Yes, it often aligns with match predictions.
- When it comes to returning second serves, Figl demonstrates superiority by winning 47.53% of points, surpassing Slump's 40.74%. Does this give Figl a decisive advantage? It potentially might.
- First serve return stats also favor Figl, who captures 28.23% of points compared to Slump's 25.35%, indicating stronger return capabilities.
- Under pressure, Slump excels in saving breakpoints at a rate of 56.41%, while Figl lags behind at 49.69%. Can Slump's resilience under pressure impact the match? This edge could certainly play a significant role.
- Looking at match outcomes over the last year, Figl boasts a higher win percentage at 59.38% versus Slump's 54.1%, hinting at overall better form.
- Both players perform best on clay, yet Slump has a slightly superior record with a win percentage of 61% compared to Figl's 53%.
- Regarding opponent quality, Figl has faced significantly higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 165.52, while Slump's average opponent rank is 429.92.
- In deciding sets, Slump has the upper hand with a 57% win rate, surpassing Figl's 50%, suggesting better performance in high-pressure situations.
- Slump’s break point conversion is 32.76%, slightly behind Figl’s 35.71%, indicating that Figl might capitalize better on opportunities. Could this factor determine the match's momentum? It very well could.
Editorial Prediction (June 26, 2025, UTC):
In analyzing the upcoming match between Slump and Figl, several elements stand out. Slump gains a slight edge in second serve performance and exhibits resilience in saving breakpoints. However, these strengths could be overshadowed by Figl's superior return game statistics, both on first and second serves.
Although Slump boasts a more favorable win percentage on their preferred surface, clay, Figl's experience against higher-ranked opponents could provide a tactical advantage. Furthermore, Figl's stronger record in breakpoint conversions might allow them to seize critical moments in the match.
Considering these factors, Figl's ability to perform against stronger competition, combined with their return game efficacy, suggests that they are the likely favorite to win this upcoming encounter.
Stijn Slump vs Maximilian Figl Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Slump vs M. Figl H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 12 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:48:58 | Average Match Time | 2:48:58 |
| 56% (49/88) | 1st Serve % | 65% (57/88) |
| 78% (38/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (40/57) |
| 72% (28/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (17/31) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 35% (31/88) | Return Points Win % | 25% (22/88) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Slump Recent Matches Played
M. Figl Recent Matches Played

S. Slump vs M. Figl Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.18% (145/100) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.01% (101/97) |
| 58.42% (326/232) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.91% (236/210) |
| 53.60% (2785/2411) | Games Win/Loss | 51.40% (2210/2090) |
| 54.55% (24/20) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.63% (13/19) |
| 60.80% (121/78) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.42% (86/75) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 714 | Aces Total | 163 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 529 | Total Double Faults | 284 |
| 1:15:9 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 338.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 225.95 |
| 54% (6239/11510) | 1st Serve % | 64% (3672/5713) |
| 71% (4427/6239) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (2235/3672) |
| 52% (2725/5271) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (970/2041) |
| 43% (526/1210) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (256/592) |
| 40% (4689/11697) | Return Points Win % | 41% (2286/5628) |
| 35.29% (6/11) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60.96% (139/89) | Futures W/L | 51.01% (101/97) |
| 59% (145/244) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (100/193) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (28/57) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (23/41) |
| 48% (32/67) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (21/55) |
| 87% (150/130) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (105/90) |
| 13% (150/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (105/14) |
| 16% (95/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (93/12) |